Frans Verdoorn was born at Amsterdam in 1906. When young his main biological interest was in the taxonomy of Hepaticae; later it was in the history of biology. His active career as a bryologist began about 1926 when he was a schoolboy and ended about 1939. In 1940 he moved to the United States and returned to Holland in 1957 to become Director of the Biohistorical Institute at the University of Utrecht. He had a very important influence on the revival of bryology immediately before and after the Second World War. This was mainly through his work as editor of the Manual of Bryology (1932) and other publications. A bibliography of Verdoorn's bryological works is included.
Gebaseerd op B. Theunissen, ‘Frans Verdoorn, op Sartons vleugels – in Linnaeus’ voetspoor’, Tijdschrift voor de Geschiedenis der Geneeskunde, Natuurwetenschappen, Wiskunde en Techniek 12 (1989) 149–166.
Gepubliceerd in
Studium : tijdschrift voor wetenschaps- en universiteitsgeschiedenis = revue d'histoire des sciences et des universités, ISSN 1876-9055 ; vol. 6 (2013), no. 3-4, p. 292-295
Impressum
2013
Illustraties
portr.
Literatuuropgave
Ja
publication
Titel
Biohistorical Institute of the University of Utrecht: Dr. Frans Verdoorn
Essays in biohistory and other contributions, presented by friends and colleagues to Frans Verdoorn on the occasion of his 60th birthday / ed. by P. Smit and R. J. Ch. V. ter Laage. - Utrecht : International Association for Plant Taxonomy, 1970. - P. XV-XXII
Frans Verdoorn (1906-1984), the renowned bryologist and publisher of the Chronica botanica series, was Professor of Biohistory at Utrecht University from 1957 until 1976. In this article his career and his 'biohistorical ideology' are reviewed. Biohistory was defined by Verdoorn as "the historical relationships of plants, animals and man in science, early medicine and culture." Verdoorn devoted most of his time and energy to elucidating and refining his ideology and his classification of the biohistorical subject matter. Much attention was also given to building up the Biohistorical Institute's library and archival collections. It is argued that Verdoorn's classificatory and bibliographical preoccupations prevented him from providing a clear cognitive identity for his field: he failed to make clear on what grounds biohistory deserved that status of an independent discipline, with its own problems and methods. This point is illustrated by a comparison of Verdoorn with two figures whom he regarded as kindred spirits, Carolus Linnaeus and George Sarton. After Verdoorn's retirement, the biohistorical ideology was abandoned and replaced by a programme in the history of biology.