Logo Universiteit Utrecht, link naar homepage

Universiteitsbibliotheek – BiGUU

Trefwoorden: Godgeleerdheid

Resultaten 21 / 30 van 1837
 publication
Jaar
2020
Gepubliceerd in
Vigilliae Christianae 74 (2020), issue 1, p. 1-3
Impressum
2020
Literatuuropgave
Nee
 publication
Titel
Abstract

De dominee-dichters van de 19e eeuw staan traditioneel te boek als saai, braaf en moralistisch. Een van hen was Nicolaas Beets (1814-1903). Tegelijk vormt hij hierop een uitzondering dankzij de befaamde verhalenbundel Camera obscura, die hij schreef als theologiestudent in Leiden. Het grootse deel van zijn leven woonde Beets echter in Utrecht, waar hij betrokken was bij lokale instellingen en talrijke gelegenheidsgedichten schreef.

Jaar
2020
Gepubliceerd in
Oud-Utrecht, tijdschrift voor geschiedenis van stad en provincie Utrecht, jg. 93 (2020), juni, p. 30-34
Impressum
2020
Illustraties
ill.
 publication
Titel
Jaar
2019
Gepubliceerd in
Oud Utrecht, jg. 92 (2019), nr. 6, p. 200-204
Impressum
2019
Illustraties
ill.
 publication
Jaar
2014
Gepubliceerd in
Arabic studies in the Netherlands : A short history in portraits, 1560-1950. - Leiden, Boston : Brill. 2014. - P. 65-73
Impressum
2014
Illustraties
ill.
Literatuuropgave
Ja
 publication
Jaar
1867
Gepubliceerd in
Biographisch woordenboek der Nederlanden ... 8 (1867), 2e stuk, p. 1426-1427
Impressum
1867
Literatuuropgave
Ja
 publication
Jaar
1930
Gepubliceerd in
Nieuw Nederlandsch biografisch woordenboek 8 (1930) 885
Impressum
1930
Literatuuropgave
Ja
 publication
Titel
Auteur
Jaar
1893
Gepubliceerd in
Archief voor Nederlandsche kerkgeschiedenis 4 (1893), p. 276-325
Impressum
1893
 publication
Titel
Abstract

Scholarship on Dutch academic culture of the Golden Age often evokes a ‘college of savants’ held to have been operative in Utrecht during the middle decades of that century, be it as a network of Cartesians or as a rather vague ‘club’ of sorts. In this article I weigh a variety of source materials, often highly polemically charged, to demonstrate that such a thing as the ‘college’ really did exist, and describe its members and activities from inception to demise. It emerges that a network of ‘progressives’ was established in the early 1650s with the appointment of the Cartesians Johannes de Bruyn, Regnerus van Mansveld, Johannes Georgius Graevius, Francis Burman, and Louis Wolzogen to the university faculty, due at least in part to the secret scheming of the physician and councillor Lambertus van Velthuysen. This Cartesian network would clash repeatedly with the city’s ‘conservative’ party, led by the influential theologian Gisbertus Voetius, often seeking freedom from the meddling and censure of the latter’s Dutch Reformed church. I furthermore show how Van Velthuysen and company also began meeting weekly in the mid 1660s as a scholarly society, discussing a variety of literary, scientific, and philosophical themes in that closed setting until the early-to-mid 1670s. Above all, this scholarly society provided Utrecht’s leading intellectuals with a platform where they could openly reflect on and think through the latest and most provocative ideas—including those of Spinoza—and their implications for religion, away from the alarmed cries of the Voetians and their prying interference.

Jaar
2019
Gepubliceerd in
Enlightened Religion : From Confessional Churches to Polite Piety in the Dutch Republic / edited by Joke Spaans, Jetze Touber. - Leiden ; Boston : Brill, 2019. - P. 156-181
Impressum
2019
Literatuuropgave
Ja
 publication
Titel
Auteur
Jaar
1942
Impressum
Rhenen: "De Banier", 1942
Illustraties
portr.
 publication
Abstract

This article examines the immediate Dutch reception of the Tractatus theologico-politicus. Using newfound archival sources it demonstrates that the anti-Spinoza activity of the Cartesians in Utrecht extends far beyond the well-known writings of Lambertus van Velthuysen and Regnerus van Mansveld. Their Cartesian network not only produced the very first public refutation to appear, but also formed a center for coordinating much of the Dutch response to Spinoza. This engagement, it is argued in closing, must be accounted for in Spinoza reception history, and forms the background to the mysterious visit Spinoza paid to Utrecht in the summer of 1673.

Jaar
2018
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 79, No. 1 (January 2018), p. 23-43
Impressum
2018
Literatuuropgave
Ja